Sunset Oil Co. v. Whistleman
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff below; defendants in error were defendants there. We so refer to them here unless otherwise designated as the Oil Company, Whistle-man, or the Bank.
Whistleman had oil and gas leases on five separate tracts of land. He assigned them to the Oil Company, reserving certain royalties and rentals, placing the assignment in escrow in the defendant bank. The assignment was in the nature of a quitclaim, without covenants of warranty.
The conditions of the escrow agreement, in so far as they are necessary to an understanding of the matters in issue, were- that the Oil…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gertner v. Limon National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Matson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Buchhalter v. MyersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Pacific Enterprises Oil Company, a California Corporation v. Charles S. HertzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Gertner v. Limon National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927