Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Champagne Tile Corp.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 8, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 2806PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEST, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this suit pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., seeking to recover back wages allegedly due him in the sum of $437, plus penalty and attorney fees as provided by law. Neither the question of whether the plaintiff was covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act, nor the question of the amount of unpaid wages are in dispute. The only question involved is whether or not, under the facts of this case, either of the defendant corporations are indebted to the plaintiff for these back wages and penalties. It is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keller v. HaasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Brown v. Benton Creosoting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- National Surety Corporation v. PopeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Glazer v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. EmployeesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Smith v. Cotton's Fleet Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Talen's Landing, Inc. v. M/v Venture, Ii, Etc., Venture Towing, Inc., Venture Marine Enterprises, Inc. And Jacques J. CreppelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rivers v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.