In re Holsberger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He maintains an office for the practice of law in Schenectady.
Respondent has admitted the charges and specifications contained in a September 1995 petition brought by the Committee on Professional Standards alleging professional misconduct. He has provided some explanatory and mitigating information in his answer to the petition.
Respondent has neglected various legal matters entrusted to him by his clients, in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 (A) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30 [a] [3]). He commenced an action in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re HolsbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996