Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Azar

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 31, 2001No. 99-P-223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

On July 28, 1989, the defendant was convicted of the second degree murder of his four month old daughter on an indictment comprehending murder in the first degree. More than six years after we affirmed his conviction in Commonwealth v. Azar, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 290 (1992), the defendant filed a pro se motion for a new trial or, “[i]n the alternative, ... for the entry of a finding of guilty to the lesser included offense of manslaughter.” The defendant claimed he was entitled to relief on the grounds that the trial judge’s instructions on third prong malice were erroneous and that his trial…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. GreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. State v. MillbrookSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Gaskins v. DuvalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. EstepMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API