Legal Opinion
In re Niagara Hudson Power Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1953No. Civ. No. 3476PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
This application, entitled “Second Supplemental Application” is made by the Securities Exchange Commission and generally requests approval and enforcement of certain determinations by the Commission relating to fees and expenses. It is an outgrowth of lengthy proceedings before the Commission, which culminated in approval by the Commission, and approval and enforcement by this court, after appellate review, of two plans relating to the Niagara Hudson Power Corporation. Such procedure was pursuant to the provisions of Section 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Finn v. Childs Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- In Re Paramount Publix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. LeventrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Norton Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- In Re Public Service Corp. Of New Jersey. Drinker Biddle & Reath v. Securities and Exchange Commission. United Corp. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Standard Gas & Electric Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission v. Northern States Power Co. (Delaware)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- In Re the United CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. F. C. Dumaine, Jr., Koppers Company, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.