USCOC of Virginia RSA 3, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Supervisors
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Senior District Judge.
In this case, the plaintiffs challenge the defendant’s denial of the plaintiffs’ application for a special use permit to construct a wireless telecommunications transmission tower. Before me now are cross-motions for summary judgment. The parties have fully briefed the issues and appeared before me for oral argument on February 6, 2003. The motions are therefore ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part and denied in part, and the defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MetroPCS, Inc. v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- CyrusOne LLC v. The City of Aurora, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018