Legal Opinion

Trapp v. State, Office of Public Advocacy

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2005No. S-11280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Under Alaska law, an individual may petition the superior court to appoint a conservator with power to. manage the individual’s finances, or a guardian with a broader, quasi-parental power to promote the individual’s well-being. In cases where no private person, is willing and competent to serve, the state Office of Public Advocacy (OPA) is appointed as a conservator or guardian. OPA w;as appointed to be Susan Trapp’s conservator in 1995, pursuant to Trapp’s petition. Before and during OPA’s conserva-torship, Trapp was addicted tq drugs and alcohol, was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sanchez v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hurn Ex Rel. D.H. v. GreenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Arlene Tripp and Jack Tripp v. City and Borough of Juneau, Derek Bos, and Juneau Police DepartmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API