Trapp v. State, Office of Public Advocacy
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Under Alaska law, an individual may petition the superior court to appoint a conservator with power to. manage the individual’s finances, or a guardian with a broader, quasi-parental power to promote the individual’s well-being. In cases where no private person, is willing and competent to serve, the state Office of Public Advocacy (OPA) is appointed as a conservator or guardian. OPA w;as appointed to be Susan Trapp’s conservator in 1995, pursuant to Trapp’s petition. Before and during OPA’s conserva-torship, Trapp was addicted tq drugs and alcohol, was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Sanchez v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Hurn Ex Rel. D.H. v. GreenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Arlene Tripp and Jack Tripp v. City and Borough of Juneau, Derek Bos, and Juneau Police DepartmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2025