Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Parrish
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided August 26, 1998No. 97-2625, 97-2626PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PIEROTTI, PARRISH, WEIRICH, NICHOLS, GLANKLER, SIMMONS, AND GIBBONS’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS ORIGINAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINTS
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court are the motions of Defendants Larry E. Parrish (Parrish), John W. Pierotti (Pierotti), William B. Gibbons (Gibbons), Jennifer Nichols (Nichols), Amy Wei-rich (Weirich), Mark Glankler (Glankler), and John Simmons (Simmons) to dismiss the amended complaints of Plaintiffs Steven C. Cooper, et al. (Cooper) and Plaintiffs Amanda Holland, et al. (Holland). Assistant Attorneys General Nichols and Weirich, as well as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steven Craig Cooper v. Larry E. ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Contreras v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Cooper v. ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000