Legal Opinion

Love v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1906No. Appeal, No. 134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 134, Oct. T., 1905, by-plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1905, No. 24, sustaining demurrer in case of Mary A. Love v. John W. Robinson and Andrew L. Robinson. Bill in equity for partition. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was in sustaining the demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

IVe agree with the learned counsel of the appellant that “ the record is in a peculiar state of confusion; ” and it may be added that neither court nor counsel appears to have given attention to our equity rules nor to the well-settled practice in equity cases. They have disregarded both and it necessarily results in confusion, in delays in the disposition of the cause, and in expense to the litigants.

This was a bill filed by Mary A. Love against John W. Robinson and Andrew L. Robinson for the partition of certain real estate in Allegheny county held by the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Love v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Long v. Stout, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API