Legal Opinion

Evans v. Hogue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1984No. 41-025; CA A22210; SC 29674Published

1Opinion of the Court

681 P.2d 1133 (1984)

296 Or. 745

Walter EVANS and Julie Evans, Husband and Wife, Respondents On Review,

v.

Harry E. HOGUE and Betty J. Hogue, Husband and Wife, and Jeannette K. Mundt, Petitioners On Review.

Harry E. Hogue and Betty J. Hogue, Husband and Wife, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs,

v.

Mary M. Wall, Third-Party Defendant.

No. 41-025; CA A22210; SC 29674.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted October 3, 1983.

Decided April 17, 1984.

Donald J. Morgan, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review Jeannette K. Mundt. With him on the briefs was Wood, Tatum, Mosser,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lent; Dissent · Campbell.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ashmun v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Low v. SchafferOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ray v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rowland v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1893

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API