Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 29, 1979No. 2-3302-EUC678-7, CA 14279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

Petitioner has petitioned for judicial review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFS) holding that her application for Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) benefits was properly denied because of her failure to sign an assignment of support rights contained in AFS form 415S.

Review of an order in a contested agency hearing 1 is limited by statute. ORS 183.482(8) provides that we may reverse or remand only if we find:

"(a) The order to be unlawful in substance or procedure, but error in procedure shall not be cause for reversal or remand unless the court shall find that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Gibson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Medsker v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. U.S. Soil v. Oregon State Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. U. S. Soil, Inc. v. Oregon State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langan v. WeeksConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API