In re Acosta
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEBTOR’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO IMPOSE THE AUTOMATIC STAY
[.Resolving ECF No. 10]
Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. Introduction
In the instant motion, the Court is asked to determine whether to grant Reynaldo Acosta’s (the “Debtor ”) Emergency Motion To Impose the Automatic Stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(4)’s required rebuttal of the presumption that a bankruptcy filing is not in good faith where the debtor had two or more cases pending within the prior year.
II. Findings Of Fact
To the extent that any Finding of Fact constitutes a Conclusion of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- In the Matter of Little Creek Development Company, Debtor. Little Creek Development Co. v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Heriberto MedranoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Neoma Shafer, Judith Ann Parks v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service United States Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Samuel Lee Crilly and Kimberly Deane CrillyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020