Legal Opinion
County of Onondaga v. Penetryn Systems, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1981PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment determining that defendants are obligated to defend and indemnify it against loss resulting from a personal injury action pending against it by one Paul Szemkow. Special Term denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted judgment to defendants. In January, 1978 plaintiff executed a contract with defendant Penetryn Systems, Inc., by which Penetryn agreed to clean and inspect the sewer system of the City of Syracuse. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. AverillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Berardi v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Vey v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Roy W. Helm, III v. Western Maryland Railway Company, a Body Corporate v. The County Commissioners of Carroll County, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Quevedo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Croteau v. A.C. & S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Magrath v. J. Migliore Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.