Legal Opinion

South Miller County Highway District v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 27, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is contended on the one hand that appellant had no right to bring this suit, the law creating the district having' been repealed, and that appellant had no valid claim in any event, because the money alleged to have been collected and misappropriated by the collector was payable to the judgment creditor, the First National Company, which only had the right to sue; and on the other hand, for the appellant, that the chancery court having assumed jurisdiction by the appointment of a réceivér to ascertain the indebtedness existing against the district and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowman Engineering Co. v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Tri-County Highway Improvement District v. Vincennes Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Meek v. ChristianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Moose v. BartlettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J&V Restaurant Supply & Refrigeration, Inc. v. Supreme Fixture Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Rodgers v. Carson Lake Road Improvement Dist. No. 6Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Jefferson Bank of St. Louis v. Little Red River Levee District of White CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. J & v. REST. SUPPLY ETC. v. Supreme Fixture Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API