Legal Opinion
United States v. Pippenger
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 29, 2008No. CR. 07-40055-15Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS
JOHN E. SIMKO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Government’s Request for Disclosure, Doc. 144
The Government’s Request for Disclosure seeks discovery pursuant to Rule 16(b) and Rule 26.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The parties are required to comply with the various rules, statutes and holdings of case law. Accordingly, the Government’s Requests for Disclosure are DENIED AS MOOT, subject to leave to reopen if discovery becomes disputed.
Defendant’s Motion for Bill of Particulars, Doc. 383
In this criminal case, Defendant is charged in the Second…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. John Monroe Kime, Also Known as Jack Kime, United States of America v. Randall Kirk BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.