City of Selma v. Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PEÑA, J.—
INTRODUCTION
When a local agency formation commission sets a public hearing on a reorganization proposal and thereafter continues the hearing date beyond the 70-day limitation for continuances under Government Code section 56666, subdivision (a), is the approval of the reorganization proposal by the commission void because it violated a mandatory provision? We conclude the 70-day limitation is a directory rather than a mandatory provision. As a result, we hold the violation of the 70-day limitation in this case did not affect the validity of the commission’s actions taken at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simmons v. GhaderiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Richard S.California Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Card v. Community Redevelopment Agency of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- County of Sonoma v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Selma v. Fresno County Local Agency etc.California Court of Appeal · 2016