Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 2010No. A09-2124PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This drug case requires us to decide the quality of circumstantial evidence necessary to support a conviction for intent to sell. Police searched Gerald Hanson’s house and found methamphetamine, a torch, a scale, pipes, plastic baggies, and other paraphernalia. The state charged Hanson with drug possession but later added the charge of possession with intent to sell, and a jury found him guilty. Hanson appeals his conviction of first-degree controlled substance crime of possession with intent to sell methamphetamine. Because the circumstantial evidence of Hanson’s guilt…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. United States v. Cornelius FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. State of Iowa v. Joseph James JeanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API