State v. Hanson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
This drug case requires us to decide the quality of circumstantial evidence necessary to support a conviction for intent to sell. Police searched Gerald Hanson’s house and found methamphetamine, a torch, a scale, pipes, plastic baggies, and other paraphernalia. The state charged Hanson with drug possession but later added the charge of possession with intent to sell, and a jury found him guilty. Hanson appeals his conviction of first-degree controlled substance crime of possession with intent to sell methamphetamine. Because the circumstantial evidence of Hanson’s guilt…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- United States v. Cornelius FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Iowa v. Joseph James JeanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017