Legal Opinion

Yulis v. Ebensburg Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1956No. Appeal, 137PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an appeal from the decree of the lower court dismissing defendant’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial.

The plaintiffs instituted an action in trespass against the defendant borough to collect damages caused by the faulty construction of a storm water sewer. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The facts and inferences therefrom, considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, as we are obliged to do, may be summarized as follows: Prior to 1948 the land was drained by an open ditch which had a small seven inch terra cotta…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Scranton CitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Fair v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Siegfried v. South Bethlehem BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Hergert AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Loss v. Avalon BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Laform v. Bethlehem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. City of Washington v. JohnsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Rooney v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. McCarthy v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. D. Sobat and E. Sobat v. The Borough of Midland ~ Appeal of: E. SobatCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API