Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1989No. 88-412Published

1Dissent

*106Justice Marshall,

with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens join, dissenting.

In my view, the language of § 106(c) of the Bankruptcy Code (Code), 11 U. S. C. § 106(c), satisfies even the requirement that Congress’ intent to abrogate the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity be “unmistakably clear.” Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 473 U. S. 234, 242 (1985). Because Congress clearly expressed its intent to authorize a bankruptcy court to issue a money judgment against a State that has not filed a proof of claim in a bankruptcy proceeding, and because Congress has the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Employees of Department of Public Health v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API