Doss v. Selman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
In a contract for the sale of mules, a recital or representation as to their ages is not a warranty, where the contract expressly provides that the seller guarantees “title only.” The contract, therefore, excludes any warranty as to the age of the mules. Purser v. Rountree, 142 Ga. 836 (83 S. E. 958); Harrell v. Holman, 21 Ga. App. 159 (93 S. E. 1018). In a suit by the seller against the purchaser, to recover the purchase price, a plea which alleges that the plaintiff falsely and fraudulently misrepresented the ages of the mules, when in fact the mules were much older, and, by reason of their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Purser v. Rountree & McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Harrell v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Harrell v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917