Legal Opinion
Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 21, 1955No. 436PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
2Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.*
Mr. Justice Reed believes certiorari should have been denied and dissents from the judgment of reversal. Mr. Justice *899Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that the petition for writ of certiorari should have been denied. Randolph J. Seifert and William A. Blank for petitioner. Robert M. Peet for respondent.
Amended May 14, 1956. 351 U. S. 183.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4Cited by22 opinions
- Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Francis T. Ratigan v. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commodities, Inc., and the Troy Union Railroad Company, Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Wehrli v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Burns v. Penn Central Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In Re Milanovic's PetitionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.