State v. Conners
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; H. E. Brunot, Judge. Peter Conners and others were convicted of robbery, and they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, C. J.
The three defendants have appealed from a conviction and sentence upon a charge of robbing one J. H. *207Robertson of clothing, watch, etc., and' present their case upon the following bills of exception:
[1] 1. To the ruling of the court admitting certain testimony, objected to by defendants on the ground that evidence to build up the credibility of a witness, whose credibility has not been attacked, is not rebuttal evidence, and is incompetent.;
It appears from the statement per curiam that defendants testified that the prosecuting witness had attempted to induce them to participate in an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SperitusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- State v. PullenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- State v. RedmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- State v. ShuffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- State v. TullosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- State v. LeiererSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.