Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Schnurman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 30, 2013No. 70048-1-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
¶1 Lalida Schnurman and Seth Schnurman dissolved their marriage and share substantially equal residential time with their two children. In calculating the parties’ child support obligations, the trial court used the child support schedule and standard calculation in chapter 26.19 RCW. The trial court found Seth to be the obligor parent and ordered him to pay a monthly transfer payment of $1,300 to Lalida. Seth argues that the standard calculation does not apply in shared residential situations. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Lalida Schnurman and Seth Schnurman1 married on June 22, 2001 and separated on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Marriage of GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re the Marriage of McNaughtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. ZassoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Christopher And Joelle Smith, Resps v. Jeanette K. Phillips, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Cindy Yen Chow v. Jacob C. CobunCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- David D. Bluhm v. Samantha L. PetronaveCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.