Legal Opinion

Holland v. Smit

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

The amended petition states that defendants executed their note, dated April 22, 1879, to the order of Charles Kraedler, for $800 and interest; that, before maturity, Charles Kraedler sold and delivered this note for value to Jennie Kraedler; that Jennie Kraedler, on January 3, 1880, assigned the same by indorsement for value to plaintiff;that $200 was paid on account of the note, on October 28, 1879, and that the balance is due plaintiff.

' The defendants filed separate answers, in which they set up that H. M. Smit was merely accommodation indorser on the note ; that, in addition to the $200…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Funkhouser v. HowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. Richardson v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  3. Gates v. KerbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
  4. Dickey v. FoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kreher v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Green v. TimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API