State v. Beckley
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
The State brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the Bennington District Court suppressing the confession of the defendant-appellee, Paul M. Beckley, to a number of burglaries. The question certified for our review is as follows:
On a totality of the circumstances did the trial court’s determination that among other things the interrogating officer’s promise to inform the State’s Attorney about the defendant’s cooperation rendered the defendant’s subsequent confession involuntary?
We answer the question in the negative with respect to the oral confession given by defendant, but…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. StrainUtah Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McNultyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Weisler, State v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.