Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The misbehavior report, the testimony of its author and documentary evidence presented at the hearing constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated inmate rules 104.13 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [5] [iv]), 106.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i]) and 107.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [i]) (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). Respondent concedes, however, that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rowe v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Fereira v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Elliott v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cross v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API