Legal Opinion

Schlanger & Sons v. Beaumont Factors

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency on its face (Rules Civ. Prac, rule 106). The plaintiff alleges that in May, 1953, it had sold certain merchandise to a third party, that the agreed sum was not paid, that suit was instituted, that judgment was obtained on September 4,1953, and that such judgment remains wholly unpaid after *945issuance of execution and return unsatisfied. It is further alleged that the debtor had confessed judgment in favor of defendant by execution of a paper in March, 1953, that the purported confession was filed on August 25, 1953, in the office of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dunham v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Chappel v. . ChappelNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Lonsdale v. SpeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Neusbaum v. . KeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bentrovato v. CrinnionNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Plohn v. PlohnNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. Carol Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Rozay v. Hegeman Steel Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API