Legal Opinion

Goss v. Smith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

. Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — Charles W. Mullan, Judge. Action to recover a commission for sale of real estate. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

1. Contracts : modification and merger: loss of original right of action. The plaintiff alleged an express oral contract, to the effect that the defendant listed for sale with him a certain farm, and expressly promised to pay him a reasonable commission when the farm was sold. The defendant answered with a general denial. Upon the trial, the ease developed by plaintiff’s evidence was somewhat different from that set forth in his petition. The decisive question pre*350seated on this appeal is one of pleading and issue. The developments of the evidence were that the defendant listed with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Merry v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. Sioux City Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Lindt v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarney v. LightnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Andreas & Son v. HempySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Bain v. UllerichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API