Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Town of Danbury

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 2, 1940No. File 57528Published

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, J.

The action is to recover of the defendants damages for alleged conduct upon their part which conduct is alleged to have procured a breach of contract between the plaintiff and the Gellatly Construction Company. Upon a trial of the case judgment was rendered for the defendants. The question raised is whether each defendant is entitled to a separate bill of costs by way of indemnity for services before trial and trial fees. The action is at law and consequently the -costs to be taxed are the creature of statute. Condon vs. Pomroy-Grace, 73 Conn. 607, 614.

Section 2271 of the General Statutes,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Condon v. Pomroy-GraceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Chambelis v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Sanford v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API