Legal Opinion

State v. Paul

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 30, 1976No. 7316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

This is a prosecution for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1975; Laws 1973, 528:321). The defendant moved to suppress and objected to the introduction in evidence of the results of a test of a blood sample which was not sealed when it arrived at the State laboratory. The Laconia District Court (Bernard I. Snierson, J.) denied the defendant’s motion and overruled his objection, and reserved and transferred his exceptions.

A police officer testified that a sample of the defendant’s blood was taken at Lakes Region General Hospital in Laconia under his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FornierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
  2. State v. ReenstiernaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  3. State v. LaFountainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  4. State v. GroulxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. State v. LadieuSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. VarneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. State v. MoscilloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Hudson v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF MOTOR VEHICLESSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API