Legal Opinion

United States v. Valdovinos-Mendez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2011No. 09-50532Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed February 15, 2011 [634 F.3d 1049] is amended as follows:

Slip Opinion, page 2485, lines 25-26 [634 F.3d at 1053]: Delete the Orozco-Acosta citation and its parenthetical.

On the same page, line 29 [634 F.3d at 1053], before the sentence <We conclude that ... > insert the following: <The Warning to Alien Ordered Removed or Deported, like the Warrant of Removal, is also non-testimonial because it is prepared routinely and “is not made in anticipation of litigation.” Orozco-Acosta, 607 F.3d at 1163. The Warning is a “standardized form” with no personalized content or factual…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API