Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1948No. Appeal, 70PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict in an interpleader proceeding. The action was initiated by an escrow agent, named in a contract between the plaintiffs and the defendant, in order to have duly adjudicated the party entitled to the escrow deposit, the contract not having been performed.

The contract consisted of a letter dated July 3, 1946, from Jacob Friedman, the defendant, addressed to Harry and Stanley Hollander, the plaintiffs. It contained Friedman’s offer to sell his “entire packing plant known as the Butler Packing Company, ...…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Wyoming National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Monongahela Street Railway Co. v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. United States National Bank v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Chaplin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alphonse Hotel Corp. v. TranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. King v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API