Legal Opinion

Dosso v. Barr

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 22, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-1009Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MAURICE DOSSO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-01009 (APM) ) WILLIAM BARR, et al. ) ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Maurice Dosso alleges that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) convinced him to apply and test for a linguist position with the agency but did not hire him after discontinuing his background investigation without explanation. Pl.’s Verified First Am. Compl., ECF No. 21-1 [hereinafter Am. Compl.], ¶¶…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Tony Best v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Tooley v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API