Legal Opinion

Brammer Corp. v. Holland-America Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The action is based upon a Marine *338Open Cargo policy. It provided the following coverage: “ 12. This insurance attaches from the time the goods leave the Warehouse and/or Store at the place named in the policy for the commencement of the transit and continues during the ordinary course of transit, including customary transhipment if any, until the goods are discharged overside from the overseas vessel at the final port. Thereafter the insurance continues whilst the goods are in transit and/or awaiting transit until delivered to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M. J. Federman Co. v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kessler Export Corp. v. Reliance Insurance Co. of Philadelphia, Penn.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  2. Irv-Bob Formal Wear, Inc. v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. Pacific Tall Ships Co. v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Citron v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
  5. Beaudoin v. Hartford Fire Insurance, No. Cv94-31 38 53 S (Jul. 3, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API