Browinski v. Pickett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 55 — Action by Browinski, &c. against Pickett, &c. to Enforce a Material Man’s Lien. APPEAL FROM CARROLL CIRCUIT COURT.
Read the full summary
Case 55 — Action by Browinski, &c. against Pickett, &c. to Enforce a Material Man’s Lien. APPEAL FROM CARROLL CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiffs for Part oi Their Claim and Browinski Appeals. 1. Appellants say the court erred in not adjudging that they had a lien on the real estate described for the full amount of $856.53 with interest from February 20, 1899 and costs. 2. The court erred in permitting appellee Barker’s amended answer to be filed, over appellant’s objection, without being verified. 3. The court erred in not rendering juprlgment against both ¿Pickett and Barker when they…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court bx
JUDGE BURNAM
Reversing.
On August, .1898, A. F. Pickett contracted with M. I. Barker to furnish all the material and labor necessary for 'the completion of a block of buildings according to the plans and specifications of the architect on a lot owned by *422Barker in Carrollton, Ky., at the price of $15,196.50. By the terms of the contract,- at the end of each month the architect was to furnish an estimate of the value of the work done by Pickett, and Barker was to pay 80 per cent, thereof, and was to retain the remaining- 20 per cent, until the completion of the building as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hightower v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schnute Holtman & Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910