Legal Opinion

United States v. Phelix Frazier

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 12, 2002No. 98-3747, 98-3748, 98-3860, 98-3926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

A federal grand jury returned an indictment alleging that Phelix H. Frazier, Sr., his son, Phelix T. Frazier,2 Darren Thomas, and Joe Robinson, along with 19 other defendants, operated a large-scale heroin distribution operation in St. Louis, Missouri. A federal trial jury found the four guilty of conspiracy to distribute drugs and of other related violations. The defendants argue on appeal that their convic*842tions and sentences are invalid. We affirm.

I. Background

Frazier, Sr. was arrested in San Diego, California, in March 1990 when he attempted to purchase approximately…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James J. Esperon v. Fred Bordallo, Director of the Guam Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2026
  2. United States v. Phelix Henry Frazier, Also Known as Towman, Also Known as Tow, Also Known as Phe, Also Known as Daddy, Also Known as Blue, Also Known as Reuben Matthews, United States of America v. Darren Thomas, Also Known as Dt, United States of America v. Joe Robinson, United States of America v. Phelix T. Frazier, Also Known as Little Phe, Also Known as Phe PheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API