Legal Opinion

Stahl v. United States

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided March 20, 2012No. CV-08-170-FVSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FRED VAN SICKLE, Senior District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the court based upon cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff is represented by Gary Randall, James J. Workland, and Eric J. Sachtjen. The defendant is represented by Jennifer D. Auchterlonie.

RELIEF REQUESTED

John Stahl and his family are members of the Stahl Hutterian Brethren (“SHB”). The SHB is part of the Hutterite movement. Hutterites live in colonies; emphasizing communal life. The SHB provides food and medical care to its members. Mr. Stahl sought to persuade the Internal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. John D. Moss, Jr. And Diane C. Moss v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Labelgraphics, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Big Sky Colony, Inc. v. Montana Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Big Sky Colony, Inc. v. Montana Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API