Legal Opinion
Ctr. for Investigative Rptg. v. DOJ
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 2020No. 18-17356PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE No. 18-17356 REPORTING, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-06557- v. JSC UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 6, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed December 3, 2020 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ctr. for Investigative Rptg. v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Grant-Davis v. HendrixDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- The Center for Investigative Reporting v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021