Lagonda Citizens National Bank v. Knowles
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*658OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
In considering the insufficiency of the proof other matters of evidence should be referred to. It appears that the Bank paid the laborers who did the work of repair, and that it paid for such implements as were used in the work. There is no evidence in the record that the step ladder' appeared defective at the time of the acci-' dent. In fact, Knowles and Mr. Link say that they saw nothing wrong with it. Upon Knowles’ explanation of the happening, which is the only explanation in evidence, the ladder appeared to fee nailed at the top, and he exerted some pressure which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Meador v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- McDonald v. LovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Harig v. McCutcheonOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scheurer v. Trustees of Open Bible ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1963