Legal Opinion

Robinson, Thieme & Morris v. Whittier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1920No. 15785PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King' county, Bonald, J., entered September 15, 1919, upon findings in favor of tbe defendants, in an action on promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel mortgage, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action upon four promissory notes aggregating $3,250, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage to secure the same, given hy H. C. Whittier to the plaintiff. Fairbanks-Morse & Company and Mill & Mine Supply Company were made parties defendant because they had taken possession of certain of the chattels covered by the mortgage. Defendant Whittier answered with the defense of usury, and the other defendants pleaded usury and a failure to file the chattel mortgage within ten days after its execution and delivery. Upon the trial, the defenses were satisfactorily proved, and from the judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Allen v. American Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wood v. SadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Clark v. KilianWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re BeecherDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
  4. Barber v. Reina Nash Motor CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In re BennettDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API