Legal Opinion

Fouts v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1933No. 7068PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Allie Rae Fouts, as executrix of John Franklin Bell, sued upon a policy of war risk insurance, alleging that the United States, acting through the Veterans’ Bureau, had rejected her claim, and that a disagreement thus arose. A special plea was filed that no appeal had been taken to the Director of the Veterans’ Bureau and no denial of the claim had been made by him or any one acting in his name. On a trial of the plea a verdict was directed sustaining it, and the suit was dismissed. This appeal followed.

The evidence in the bill of exceptions consists mostly of extracts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. DensmoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. Straw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Rosario v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  3. United States v. EarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. United States v. PrimiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  5. McLaughlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API