Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. Marx

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1925No. 2 Div. 881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The original bill by Marx is for foreclosure of a mortgage given by Lunsford to De Graffenried to secure the balance of the purchase price of the lands embraced in that conveyance.

The original bill alleges that said mortgagor had conveyed the land to Davis subject to the terms of the De Graffenried mortgage, and makes parties respondent the mortgagor and grantee Davis, and does not make a party the original grantee, De Graffenried, if living, or his legal representatives, if he is dead. It was held that the lack of necessary parties complainant and respondent shown by inspection of the bill…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Whiteman v. TaberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Cox v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ezzell v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Eureka Coal Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Pacific National Fire Insurance Company v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Flagg v. Florence Discount Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. McGowin v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API