Grabfelder v. Vosburgh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Albert G. Vosburgh, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Wyoming on the 22d day of December, 1900, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office'on the 24th day of August, 1901, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Spring, J.:
This case was submitted to the jury, but upon their failure to agree the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
On the 19th day of July, 1899, the defendant gave to the agent of the plaintiff, a wholesale liquor dealer, an order for a cask of rye, the order signed by the defendant reading as follows:
“ Warsaw, July 19, 1899.
“ S. Grabfelder & Co.,
“Louisville, Ky.
“ I have this day ordered through your salesman, Mr. Alex. U. Freiberg, the .following goods:
“ Ship via.
“ 1 cask Old Consolation pure rye, $3.00.
“ Terms 4 months. A. G. VOSBURG,
“ Warsaw, U. Y.”
It will be'…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sherkate Sahami Khass Rapol v. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Doolittle v. J. C. Murray & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Maier v. RebstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Sherkate Sahami Khass Rapol (Rapol Construction Co.) v. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc., Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc., and Third-Party v. Lufkin Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Carman Distributing Co. v. Cascade Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.