Legal Opinion
Gene & Gene, LLC v. BIOPAY, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 22, 2010No. 09-31191PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
In this second interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, BioPay, L.L.C. (BioPay) challenges the district court’s grant of Gene & Gene, L.L.C.’s (Gene) motion to re-certify a class. As in the first interlocutory appeal, Gene & Gene LLC v. BioPay LLC, 541 F.3d 318 (5th Cir.2008) (BioPay I), we REVERSE and REMAND.
I. BACKGROUND
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq., prohibits sending unsolicited advertisements from one fax machine to another. Id. at § 227(b)(1)(C). Between 2001 and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin's Herend Imports, Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading United States of America Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gene and Gene LLC v. BIOPAY LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Regents of the University of California v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Quinton Brown v. Nucor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Madison Ex Rel. Hebert v. Chalmette Refining, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- K. P. v. Lorraine LeBlancCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Manno v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Padilla-Caldera v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.