State v. Harmon
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBistline, Justice
I
The Sentence
Although I do concur in upholding the sentence imposed by the district court, I do believe that it may turn out to be excessive. If the defendant is withdrawn from society, then, during that time little children will be safe from his inexcusable activities — which is surely what the district court considered a foremost requirement. Although the majority opinion seems more bent on punishment for the sake of punishment, it is difficult to envision this defendant as a hardened criminal. There ordinarily is insufficient time during which the district court has jurisdiction to alter a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Richard L. Balthazar v. Superior Court of the Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- State v. NieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.