Legal Opinion

Muir v. Citizens National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1905No. 5196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Neterer, J., entered January 25, 1904, upon sustaining a demurrer to an answer, granting a mandatory injunction as prayed for in the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

This action was brought for the purpose of obtaining an order against the defendant, requiring it to transfer to plaintiff six shares of its stock on the books of the corporation, and to issue to plaintiff, in his own name, a certificate therefor, in lieu of a certificate purchased from a former stockholder of record. The defendant appeared in the action, and filed a motion to strike certain words and make a more specific statement of some of the allegations of the complaint. These motions were denied, and thereupon a demurrer to the complaint was filed, which was also denied. Defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Rosenblatt v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Merchants & Miners National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Aalwyn's Law Institute v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API