Legal Opinion
WINDISH v. 3M COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01531Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMY WINDISH, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, NO. 23-1531 Defendant. OPINION Defendant 3M Company (“3M”) moves for the Court to sanction Plaintiff Amy Windish for her alleged repeated and willful failures to comply with the Court’s orders relating to discovery in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b), (e). For the following reasons, 3M’s Motion will be granted, and Windish’s Complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND According to her Complaint, Windish was an employee of 3M Company during the COVID-19…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.