Legal Opinion

AT&T Mobility Services, LLC v. Boyd

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 22, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02539Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Case No. 1:19cv2539 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER Robert Boyd, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant. ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion to Compel Arbitration”) of Plaintiff AT&T Mobility Services, LLC (“AT&T”). (Doc. No. 3.) Defendant Robert Boyd (“Boyd”) filed a brief in opposition to AT&T’s Motion to Compel Arbitration on November 22, 2019, to which AT&T replied on December 5, 2019. (Doc. Nos. 10, 13.) The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Delay v. Rosenthal Collins Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API