Legal Opinion

Xiloj-Itzep v. City of Agoura Hills

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1994No. B067188PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

I

Introduction

This appeal arises from the unsuccessful attempt of plaintiffs in the trial court to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of defendant City of Agoura Hills’ (City) ordinance which regulates solicitation from persons traveling in vehicles on City streets (Ordinance).

II

Contentions

Appellants contend the Ordinance was adopted to prevent them from seeking daywork in the City and prevents them from congregating on City sidewalks in violation of their First Amendment rights, the equal protection clause and the right to work.

City contends that as the Ordinance…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Horton v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  4. Los Angeles Alliance for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. City of Malibu v. Santa Monica Mountains ConservancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API