Legal Opinion

Hazard v. Planters' & Merchants' Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

EeroR to the Circuit Court of Mobile.

1Opinion of the CourtOrmond, J.

This is an action instituted by motion on the part of the Bank against the plaintiffs in error as makers of a promissory note, by which they promised to pay the amount for which the note is given to “the President and Directors of the Planters’ and Merchants’ Bank of Mobile,” and the objection is that the note is not payable to the corporation nor any proof that it was the owner of the note.

The corporate name of the Bank is “ The Planters’ and Merchants’ Bank of Mobile,” and the necessary intendment is that this note is payable to the corporation. The President and Directors are those who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Alston v. HeartmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Darby v. Berney National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API